In a move that would make many capitalist's head explode if it ever happened here, Iceland just sentenced their 26th banker to prison for their part in the 2008 financial collapse.
In two separate Icelandic Supreme Court and Reykjavik District Court rulings, five top bankers from Landsbankinn and Kaupping - the two largest banks in the country - were found guilty of market manipulation, embezzlement, and breach of fiduciary duties. Most of those convicted have been sentenced to prison for two to five years. The maximum penalty for financial crimes in Iceland is six years, although their Supreme Court is currently hearing arguments to consider expanding sentences beyond the six year maximum.
All those deferred prosecutions stacking up at the DOJ for Bank of America, it's time Ms. Lynch starts hauling in the employees sitting in their corporate offices, right? Are Mr. Moynihan & the excutives within the corporate offices at Bank of America next to go to jail?
Stewart Parnell is the first modern U.S. food executive imprisoned for poisoning customers.
An ex-peanut company mogul may spend the rest of his life behind bars after a federal judge in Georgia on Monday sentenced him to 28 years for shipping tainted products that caused a deadly nationwide salmonella outbreak seven years ago.
Stewart Parnell, the former Peanut Corporation of America owner, was convicted of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, wire fraud and other crimes related the 2008 and 2009 outbreak that killed nine people, sickened more than 700 and prompted one of the largest food recalls in U.S. history. Two others involved with the now-bankrupt company also were sentenced to long prison terms.
Are Mr. Moynihan & the excutives within the corporate offices at Bank of America next to go to jail?
Now that two of the biggest U.S. banks are convicted felons, the Justice Department appears to have proven the point it set out to make a year ago -- that it could deliver the harshest penalty possible against financial institutions without inflicting fatal wounds.
The attorneys that represent felon banks along with corrupt law enforcement individuals who protect them (by banking with these felon banks) will go to jail too, right? The non-corrupt FBI and non-corrupt law enforcement individuals need to obtain data dumps of ALL accounts held at each of these felon banks and cross-check the account holder names or businesses with current and previous law enforcement personel around the country (event do a look back to the past 7 years since September 2008. The felons working within these banks must be on overtime destroying records as fast as they can, right? It's felons protecting felons, right? They have to protect those judges getting stashes of cash/payoffs so bankers don't go to jail, right?). If their name is found, arrest that law enforcement individual for accessory to financial crimes comitted by these felon banks. While they are at this, find out who took the TARP money at these banks too (it would be interesting to see how many law enforcemrnt individuals got it for protection money). Non corrupt elements of the FBI and other non-corrupt law enforcement agencies do have their work cut out and over time, corruption will be exposed more and more. It's obvious by now the list of individuals who need to go to jail is well into the 1000's. Let the initial rounding up begin. LaPorta gives you a green light to go into Bank of America's corporate offices at any time. As a mater of fact, LaPorta would like to be on that team to round up the Bank of America Corporate Criminals. Non-corrupt prosecutors - START YOUR ENGINES AND DELIVER JUSTICE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY PUTTING THESE SON-OF-A-BITCHES IN PRISION FOR A VERY LONG TIME! THEIR CLAWS ON THE AMERICAN ECONOMY NEED TO BE REMOVED AND POWER TAKEN AWAY!
HONG KONG - When Hong Kong police were called to the upmarket apartment of 29-year-old British banker Rurik Jutting here over the weekend, they found the naked bodies of two young Asian women - one with her throat slashed lying on the floor in a pool of blood, the other, who had been dead for about five days, decomposing in a suitcase on the balcony.
Jutting, a high-flying Cambridge University graduate who recently left his job as a securities trader at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, was charged Monday with the double murder. It is a case already drawing comparisons to the Bret Easton Ellis novel "American Psycho," about an investment banker who leads a double life as a serial killer.
Bank of America (BAC) has now joined JPMorgan Chase (JPM) in a special category called: Banks That Agreed to Pay Billions in Fraud Fines While No Executives Have Gone to Jail.
Is it becase Bank of America is a Republican bank and Republicans make up the majority who control corrupt law enforcement agencies around the USA (i.e. friends protecting friends and are advocates to NSA spying on Americans because they are power and control freaks)? Note: LaPorta is a Non-Partisan Progressive and he knows the truth. The truth ALWAYS prevails over evil and what Bank of America did to LaPorta (a MILITARY family) will never be forgotten.
What makes these executives at Bank of America so special? If our corrupt law enforcement agencies aren't going to put these Bank of America executives in jail then we need to send U.S. Military personnel over to the corporate offices of Bank of America at 100 North Tryon, Charlotte NC 28255-0001 and take out these executives. Since Bank of America is considered "too big to fail", we will need a large scale military operation and this should be aired on national television. Justice needs to be served either foreign or domestic, right?
Bank of America Corp was found liable for fraud on Wednesday over defective mortgages sold by its Countrywide unit, a major win for the U.S. government in one of the few trials stemming from the financial crisis. The case is U.S. ex rel. O'Donnell v. Bank of America Corp et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 12-01422.
Should LaPorta file ANOTHER police report? Any local, state and federal law enforcement personnel still conducting business with Bank of America needs to be exposed. Those local, state and federal law enforcement personnel obviously condone fraud as a business model. Just who are they protecting? Is this what makes Bank of America employees immune from prosecution?
LaPorta is recommending to non-corrupt law enforcement agencies and non-corrupt prosecutors to begin putting teams together to enter the corporate offices of Bank of America at 100 North Tryon, Charlotte NC 28255-0001. Many Bank of America employees need to go to prison (you may begin with the Bank of America employees listed in LaPorta's timeline along with their managers (and right up the chain to the executive offices) for concealing bank fraud. Examples need to be set at Bank of America with these sociopathic employees (i.e. power and control freaks as well as liars) that you do not do this to the good people of America. The time has well passed and the power and control needs to be taken away from this criminal enterprise.
"Today's filing marks the latest step forward in the Justice Department's ongoing efforts to hold accountable those who engage in fraudulent or irresponsible conduct," Attorney General Eric Holder said in a statement.
Melinda L. Goodnight, Director for Consumer Complaint Operations at the OCC stated, "... the foreclosure process was active on your primary residence between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010 ...". Ms. Goodnight also stated "... consumers that may have been subject to
unsafe and unsound mortgage servicing and foreclosure practices ..."
This initial illegal foreclosure attempt was in direct retaliation because LaPorta is helping to expose the criminal activity going on at Bank of America, right? Shouldn't Bank of America employees listed in LaPorta's timeline be charged with bank fraud? Does LaPorta need to amend his complaint (to include Mr. Kevin Smith, Consumer Advocate with the Office of the CEO & President at Bank of America) already on file with the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department?
Mortgage workers falsified records and were told to delay U.S. loan-assistance applications by requesting paperwork that the Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank had already received, according to statements from ex-employees filed last week in federal court in Boston. The lender improperly disqualified applicants to the Home Affordable Modification Program, or HAMP, according to a May 23 statement from Simone Gordon, a loss-mitigation specialist who left the company in 2012.
"Potentially, the government may amend its complaint to include individuals, present or former employees of Bank of America," Assistant U.S. Attorney Pierre Armand told U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff. The judge asked the prosecutors to amend their complaint by year end. The case involves mortgage lender Countrywide Financial Corp, which Bank of America bought in July 2008.
WARNING - WHAT YOU'RE ABOUT TO READ REEKS WITH RICO VIOLATIONS!!!
As more and more individuals are being exposed, LaPorta is recommending to state and federal prosecutors that charges against judges and attorneys who represented Bank of America on many "dismissed" federal cases be included in U.S. ex rel. O'Donnell v. Bank of America Corp et al, U.S, District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 12-01422. These individuals conspired together to conceal the truth (NRS 205.372 Mortgage lending fraud, section 1(a)(b)(c)(d)(e) & sections 2-7, criminal penalities). In LaPorta's case, he tried to report the facts as well as seek answers through a federal court but only to have the case dismissed without appearing because a court date or time was never issued.
"If Bank of America can't legally convey, then LaPorta can't legally convey..."
On December 1, 2012 at 9:40 AM, LaPorta filed a sworn 27 page affidavit/complaint/incident report with the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department regarding the manufactured Mortgage Assignment and potentially CountryWide Bank "robo-stamped" and/or "robo-signed" endorsements on the First Horizon Home Loans promissory note that Bank of America is trying to use to foreclose on LaPorta's home.
On December 3, 2012 at 12:50 PM, LaPorta placed a follow-up call to the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and spoke with Detective Rhoads regarding LaPorta's sworn 27 page affidavit/complaint/incident report filed on December 1, 2012 at 9:40 AM with the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department.
In mid-2009, LaPorta simply wanted to refinance his home... but later found out that there was no home to refinance, at least legally on paper! You see, Bank of America needs to robo-sign/manufacture documents to prove ownership of the debt under Nevada AB 284. Bank of America has collected payments for more than 3 years and did not have title to LaPorta's home, that is until LaPorta like thousands of other Americans sued Bank of America for answers on July 1, 2011.
As LaPorta's case was pending in United States District Court, Judge Dawson's court, a very serious question remains. Why did Bank of America record a Corporation Assignment of Deed of Trust with the Clark County, Nevada Recorder's Office on December 22, 2011 some 3.5 years later after the merger with Countrywide? Was this Corporation Assignment of Deed of Trust robo-signed/manufactured to cover-up the fact that Bank of America did not have proper title to LaPorta's house and violated Nevada state law? Is Judge Dawson working with Bank of America to allow them to robo-sign/manufacture documents? It surely appears to be.
LaPorta met with a Compliance Investigator in the Nevada Attorney General's Office Bureau of Criminal Justice on January 11, 2012. After reviewing the facts, LaPorta was advised to file a Consumer Complaint against Bank of America. LaPorta filed the Consumer Complaint on January 20, 2012.
On March 20, 2012, Judge Dawson silenced the plaintiff, LaPorta without allowing LaPorta to speak about the facts or even enter his court room. Judge Dawson ruled by dismissing LaPorta's case without addressing all of the items in LaPorta's original complaint. A court date or time was never issued to LaPorta. Should Judge Dawson be charged with obstruction of justice for filing a false report of the incident? In his decision by the court, LaPorta's action did not come to trial or hearing before the court. The issues were not tried or heard even though a decision was rendered in favor of defendants, Bank of America and against plaintiff, LaPorta. Security vs. Access To Courts is in question. That's kind of the two-edged sword because if you can't provide the access to the court, why have access? And at the same time, Judge Dawson as the steward of justice, has to take precautions to protect LaPorta from criminality on the banks part, of mishandling or concealment.
Is it because the attorney's representing Bank of America filed non-factual Mortgage Assignments in Exhibit C on August 19, 2011? Or, was it because the attorney's representing Bank of America failed to include LaPorta's 2nd & 3rd Qualified Written Request (QWR) in Exhibit D on August 19, 2011? Or, was it because LaPorta simply requested to see a loan file Bank of America had but they wanted to keep it concealed? Did the attorney's representing Bank of America commit perjury as well as obstruct justice and Judge Dawson covered it up? It surely appears to be.
In an un-related case, the Las Vegas Review Journal newspaper reported on July 8, 2012 that the FBI is probing a link between Judge Dawson's son and a nightclub operator. Agents assigned to the FBI's public corruption squad in Las Vegas are handling the investigation. A similar story appeared in the Las Vegas Sun newspaper on July 9, 2012. On September, 7, 2012, the Las Vegas Review Journal reported the FBI's public corruption squad in Las Vegas launched a criminal investigation into Judge Dawson's son.
To help better explain Judge Dawson's "judgement" and reasoning in favor of Bank of America, LaPorta does in fact have an "alternative" ...
... it's to expose a pretorian class of individuals who are hell bent on protecting the status quo with reckless disregards for truth and law. You see, Judge Dawson and Bank of America do not want the truth to be known - HERE IT COMES Judge Dawson and Bank of America. As John Boehner, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives says, "You Can't Handle The Truth!"
It appears Judge Dawson thinks it is perfectly fine for Bank of America to collect payments without having any paperwork in Bank of America's name (i.e. defraud a homeowner). LaPorta is DEMANDING answers to the following questions:
Just what is Bank of America servicing and who is Bank of America collecting payments for?
How could Bank of America be collecting Personal Mortgage Insurance (PMI) payments from LaPorta without any paperwork in Bank of America's name?
How could a Personal Mortgage Insurance policy be underwritten to Bank of America?
Why did Bank of America report false information about LaPorta's mortgages to the credit agencies beginning in February 2008 when LaPorta originated with First Horizon Home Loans?
Why didn't Bank of America record Assignments of Deed of Trust with the Clark County, Nevada Recorder's Office prior to taking the first payment from LaPorta on September 1, 2009?
Why did Bank of America notify LaPorta on December 14, 2010 that he was in default when LaPorta has never missed a payment?
Why did State Farm Insurance remove Bank of America as the Mortgagee off of LaPorta's Homeowner Policy on two separate occasions in 2011?
Why did the attorneys representing Bank of America file non-factual Mortgage Assignments in a response to LaPorta's lawsuit in Exhbit C on August 19, 2011?
Why did the attorneys representing Bank of America fail to include LaPorta's 2nd and 3rd Qualified Written Request (QWR) in a response to LaPorta's lawsuit in Exhbit D on August 19, 2011?
Why did Bank of America record a Corporation Assignment of Deed of Trust with the Clark County, Nevada Recorder's Office on December 22, 2011 some 3.5 years later after the merger with Countrywide?
Why, for the past 2 years does Bank of America continually send LaPorta his origination documents from First Horizon Home Loans with no evidence that Countrywide Bank FSB ever took proper possesion of LaPorta's loans? It's evident in the paperwork Bank of America sends to LaPorta.
Why do the mortgage documents on Bank of America's website show no endorsements by Countrywide or any other financial institution that Bank of America claims was the owner of LaPorta's mortgages (violations under UCC \A7 9-203. Attachment and Enforceability of Security Interest; Proceeds; Formal Requisites)? This was witnessed by the Compliance Investigator with the Nevada Attorney General's Office on January 11, 2012 that prompted LaPorta to file a Consumer Complaint with the Nevada Attorney General on January 20, 2012. LaPorta's Consumer Complaint on file with the Nevada Attorney General's Office was transferred to the Fraud Unit on August 8, 2012.
Why did Judge Dawson fail to schedule a hearing for LaPorta to come into his courtroom to inspect, as requested, the loan file Bank of America had PRIOR to dismissing LaPorta's case on March 20, 2012? Was Judge Dawson "paid-off" by Bank of America to keep LaPorta's loan file concealed?
Why does Bank of America employee Kikisha Holmes send LaPorta a letter on November 10, 2012 stating LaPorta's "Home Equity Loan" could not be modified? LaPorta does not have a Home Equity Loan. LaPorta never never had a Home Equity Loan with Bank of America or First Horizon Home Loans, LaPorta's originating lender.
Why does Bank of America employee Jamila Humbert send LaPorta a letter on March 28, 2013 stating "...you do not met the eligibility requirements to qualify for loan payment assistance or other alternatives to foreclosure inlcuding a short sale and deed-in-lieu of foreclosure."?
Why didn't Judge Dawson fully protect LaPorta's rights during his decision making as a United States District Court Judge. Judge Dawson had a responsibility to fully protect LaPorta's rights during United States District Court proceedings (i.e. LaPorta's right to Trial by Jury that he requested).
Why did Bank of America file a Substitution of Trustee and Full Reconveyance with the Clark County, Nevada Recorder's Office on November 19, 2013 after LaPorta paid off his First Horizon Home Loans 2nd Mortgage? LaPorta's title company, Equity Title of Nevada is still in business. The substitution trustee listed is ReconTrust, a subsidiary of Bank of America. Was this done so Bank of America could conceal the mortgage fraud it has perpetrated against LaPorta and continue to violate Nevada state law?
Why did Michael Durrance, Customer Advocate, Office of the CEO and President, Bank of America file "Corrective Releases" on LaPorta's Mortgage Assignments AFTER Bank of America was found liable for Countrywide mortgage fraud. and AFTER LaPorta obtained financing of his First Hornizon Home Loans with a new lender? Is Michael Durrance, Customer Advocate, Office of the CEO and President, Bank of America attempting to cover up fraud to reduce liability for Bank of America?
Why did Michael Durrance, Customer Advocate, Office of the CEO and President, Bank of America address correspondence to LaPorta, prefixing LaPorta's name with "Rev."? Is the truth beginning to affect Michael Durrance, Customer Advocate, Office of the CEO and President, Bank of America?
Why did Bank of America file "new" mortgage assignments from First Horizon Home Loans to Bank of America with the Clark County, Nevada Recorder's Office on March 19, 2014? Why was this done more than 3 months after LaPorta obtained new financing with another lender and more than 4.5 years after LaPorta reported the issues NUMEROUS times (to law enforcement agencies) all while making payments to Bank of America? Was this done to conceal the Countrywide mortgage fraud (i.e. fraudulent Countrywide mortgage assignments submitted to a Federal Court by attorney's representing Bank fo America in LaPorta v. Bank Of America et al Case Number: 2:2011cv01094). Was this done to release LaPorta's home as a liability for Bank of America?
Why did Bank of America show up as the Mortgagee on LaPorta's State Farm Homeowner's Insurance Policy Renewal almost a year after LaPorta obtained a new lender due to all the Bank of America fraud? Bank of America mortgage fraud still continues. Why aren't Bank of America employees in jail?
These are just some questions LaPorta wanted to ask Judge Dawson and a jury. Since LaPorta was never given a court date and time, LaPorta's only option is to stop making payments to Bank of America and enter the State of Nevada Foreclsoure Mediation Program (police will be summoned to attend) to get his answers. LaPorta's civil rights were violated and Judge Dawson as well as Bank of America must be held accountable for their crony tactics.
Because LaPorta sees no justice served by Judge Dawson, LaPorta created this website to remind Judge Dawson to re-read his history books again, "We the People ..." and "... Justice for All". It appears Judge Dawson interprets justice as "just us", him and Bank of America. A court date with a time and Trial By Jury is a right guaranteed by the United States and Nevada Constitutions, it is the election of every citizen. The facts are evident and let the truth be told here, it's LaPorta's only voice ...for now.
ExposeBankOfAmerica.org is a public affairs website designed to be a resource for non-corrupt local, state and federal law enforcement personnel to gather information regarding the deceptive business practices at Bank of America which continue to hurt Nevada consumers.
LaPorta is a Non-Partisan Progressive and is not afilliated with any of the corrupt political parties destroying the USA.
Help LaPorta bring Bank of America to justice by donating to the cause: